Author: Richard Seroter

  • Using Azure API Management with Cloud Foundry

    Using Azure API Management with Cloud Foundry

    APIs, APIs everywhere. They power our mobile apps, connect our “things”, and improve supply chains. API management suites popped up to help companies secure, tune, version, and share their APIs effectively. I’ve watched these suites expand beyond the initial service virtualization and policy definition capabilities to, in some cases, replace the need for an ESB. One such suite is Azure API Management. I decided to take Azure API Management for a spin, and use it with a web service running in Cloud Foundry.

    Cloud Foundry is an ideal platform for running modern apps, and it recently added a capability (“Route Services“) that lets you inject another service into the request path. Why is this handy? I could use this feature to transparently introduce a caching service, a logging service, an authorization service, or … an API gateway. Thanks to Azure API Management, I can add all sorts of functionality to my API, without touching the code. Specifically, I’m going to try and add response caching, rate limiting, and IP address filtering to my API.

    2017-01-16-cf-azureapi-01

    Step 1 – Deploy the web service

    I put together a basic Node.js app that serves up “startup ideas.” If you send an HTTP GET request to the root URL, you get all the ideas back. If you GET a path (“/startupideas/1”) you get a specific idea. Nothing earth-shattering.

    Next up, deploying my app to Cloud Foundry. If your company cares about shipping software, you’re probably already running Pivotal Cloud Foundry somewhere. If not, no worries. Nobody’s perfect. You can try it out for free on Pivotal Web Services, or by downloading a fully-encapsulated VM.

    Note: For production scenarios, you’d want your API gateway right next to your web services. So if you want to use Cloud Foundry with Azure API Management, you’ll want to run apps in Pivotal Cloud Foundry on Azure!

    The Cloud Foundry CLI is a super-powerful tool, and makes it easy to deploy an app—Java, .NET, Node.js, whatever. So, I typed in “cf push” and watched Cloud Foundry do it’s magic.

    2017-01-16-cf-azureapi-02

    In a few seconds, my app was accessible. I sent in a request, and got back a JSON response along with a few standard HTTP headers.

    2017-01-16-cf-azureapi-03

    At this point, I had a fully working service deployed, but was in dire need of API management.

    Step 2 – Create an instance of Azure API Management

    Next up, I set up an instance of Azure API Management. From within the Azure Portal, I found it under the “Web + Mobile” category.

    2017-01-16-cf-azureapi-04

    After filling in all the required fields and clicking “create”, I waited about 15 minutes for my instance to come alive.

    2017-01-16-cf-azureapi-05

    Step 3 – Configure API in Azure API Management

    The Azure API Management product is meant to help companies create and manage their APIs. There’s a Publisher Portal experience for defining the API and managing user subscriptions, and a Developer Portal targeted at devs who consume APIs. Both portals are basic looking, but the Publisher Portal is fairly full-featured. That’s where I started.

    Within the Publisher Portal, I defined a new “Product.” A product holds one or more APIs and has settings that control who can view and subscribe to those APIs. By default, developers who want to use APIs have to provide a subscription token in their API calls. I don’t feel like requiring that, so I unchecked the “require subscription” box.

    2017-01-16-cf-azureapi-06

    With a product in place, I added an API record. I pointed to the URL of my service in Cloud Foundry, but honestly, it didn’t matter. I’ll be overwriting it later at runtime.

    2017-01-16-cf-azureapi-07

    In Azure API Management, you can call out each API operation (URL + HTTP verb) separately. For a given operation, you have the choice of specifying unique behaviors (e.g. caching). For a RESTful service, the operations could be represented by a mix of HTTP verbs and extension of the URL path. That is, one operation might be to GET “/customers” and another could GET “/customers/100/orders.”

    2017-01-16-cf-azureapi-08

    In the case of Route Services, the request is forwarded by Cloud Foundry to Azure API Management without any path information. It redirects all requests to the root URL in Azure API Management and puts the full destination URL in an HTTP header (“x-cf-forwarded-url”). What does that mean? It means that I need to define a single operation in Azure API Management, and use policies to add different behaviors for each operation represented by unique paths.

    Step 4 – Create API policy

    Now, the fun stuff! Azure API Management has a rich set of management policies that we use to define our API’s behavior. As mentioned earlier, I wanted to add three behaviors: caching, IP address filtering, and rate limited. And for fun, I also wanted to add an output HTTP header to prove that traffic flowed through the API gateway.

    You can create policies for the whole product, the API, or the individual operation. Or all three! The policy that Azure API Management ends up using for your API is a composite of all applicable policies. I started by defining my scope at the operation level.

    2017-01-16-cf-azureapi-09

    Below is my full policy. What should you pay attention to? On line 10, notice that I set the target URL to whatever Cloud Foundry put into the x-cf-forwarded-url header. On lines 15-18, I do IP filtering to keep a particular source IP from calling the service. See on line 23 that I’m rate limiting requests to the root URL (all ideas) only. Lines 25-28 spell out the request caching policy. Finally, on line 59 I define the cache expiration period.

    <policies>
      <!-- inbound steps apply to inbound requests -->
      <inbound>
        <!-- variable is "true" if request into Cloud Foundry includes /startupideas path -->
        <set-variable name="isStartUpIdea" value="@(context.Request.Headers["x-cf-forwarded-url"].Last().Contains("/startupideas"))" />
        <choose>
          <!-- make sure Cloud Foundry header exists -->
          <when condition="@(context.Request.Headers["x-cf-forwarded-url"] != null)">
            <!-- rewrite the target URL to whatever comes in from Cloud Foundry -->
            <set-backend-service base-url="@(context.Request.Headers["x-cf-forwarded-url"][0])" />
            <choose>
              <!-- applies if request is for /startupideas/[number] requests -->
              <when condition="@(context.Variables.GetValueOrDefault<bool>("isStartUpIdea"))">
                <!-- don't al low direct calls from a particular IP -->
                <ip-filter action="forbid">
    <address>63.234.174.122</address>
    
                </ip-filter>
              </when>
              <!-- applies if request is for the root, and returns all startup ideas -->
              <otherwise>
                <!-- limit callers by IP to 10 requests every sixty seconds -->
                <rate-limit-by-key calls="10" renewal-period="60" counter-key="@(context.Request.IpAddress)" />
                <!-- lookup requests from the cache and only call Cloud Foundry if nothing in cache -->
                <cache-lookup vary-by-developer="false" vary-by-developer-groups="false" downstream-caching-type="none" must-revalidate="false">
                  <vary-by-header>Accept</vary-by-header>
                  <vary-by-header>Accept-Charset</vary-by-header>
                </cache-lookup>
              </otherwise>
            </choose>
          </when>
        </choose>
      </inbound>
      <backend>
        <base />
      </backend>
      <!-- output steps apply to after Cloud Foundry reeturns a response -->
      <outbound>
        <!-- variables hold text to put into the custom outbound HTTP header -->
        <set-variable name="isroot" value="returning all results" />
        <set-variable name="isoneresult" value="returning one startup idea" />
        <choose>
          <when condition="@(context.Variables.GetValueOrDefault<bool>("isStartUpIdea"))">
            <set-header name="GatewayHeader" exists-action="override">
              <value>@(
            	   (string)context.Variables["isoneresult"]
            	  )
              </value>
            </set-header>
          </when>
          <otherwise>
            <set-header name="GatewayHeader" exists-action="override">
              <value>@(
                   (string)context.Variables["isroot"]
                  )
              </value>
            </set-header>
            <!-- set cache to expire after 10 minutes -->
            <cache-store duration="600" />
          </otherwise>
        </choose>
      </outbound>
      <on-error>
        <base />
      </on-error>
    </policies>
    

    Step 5 – Add Azure API Management to the Cloud Foundry route

    At this stage, I had my working Node.js service in Cloud Foundry, and a set of policies configured in Azure API Management. Next up, joining the two!

    The Cloud Foundry service marketplace makes it easy for devs to add all sorts of services to an app—databases, caches, queues, and much more. In this case, I wanted to add a user-provided service for Azure API Management to the catalog. It just took one command:

    cf create-user-provided-service azureapimgmt -r https://seroterpivotal.azure-api.net

    All that was left to do was bind my particular app’s route to this user-provided service. That also takes one command:

    cf bind-route-service cfapps.io azureapimgmt –hostname seroter-startupideas

    With this in place, Azure API Management was invisible to the API caller. The caller only sends requests to the Cloud Foundry URL, and the Route Service intercepts the request!

    Step 6 – Test the service

    Did it work?

    When I sent an HTTP GET request to https://seroter-startupideas.cfapps.io/startupideas/1 I saw a new HTTP header in the result.

    2017-01-16-cf-azureapi-10

    Ok, so it definitely went through Azure API Management. Next I tried the root URL that has policies for caching and rate limiting.

    On the first call to the root URL, I saw an log entry recorded in Cloud Foundry, and a JSON response with the latest timestamp.

    2017-01-16-cf-azureapi-11

    With each subsequent request, the timestamp didn’t change, and there was no entry in the Cloud Foundry logs. What did that mean? It meant that Azure API Management cached the initial response and didn’t send future requests back to Cloud Foundry. Rad!

    The last test was for rate limiting. It didn’t matter how many requests I sent to https://seroter-startupideas.cfapps.io/startupideas/1 I always got a result. No surprise, as there was no rate limiting for that operation. However, when I sent a flurry of requests to https://seroter-startupideas.cfapps.io I got back the following response:

    2017-01-16-cf-azureapi-12

    Very cool. With zero code changes, I added caching and rate-limiting to my Node.js service.

    Next Steps

    Azure API Management is pretty solid. There are lots of great tools in the API Gateway market, but if you’re running apps in Microsoft Azure, you should strongly consider this one. I only scratched the service of the capabilities here, and I plan to spend some more time investigating user subscription and authentication capabilities.

    Have you used Azure API Management? Do you like it?

  • 2016 in Review: Reading and Writing Highlights

    2016 was a wild year for plenty of folks. Me too, I guess. The wildest part was joining Pivotal and signing up for a job I’d never done before. I kept busy in other ways in 2016, including teaching a couple of courses for Pluralsight, traveling around to speak at conferences, writing a bunch for InfoQ.com, and blogging here with semi-regularity. 2017 should be more of the same (minus a job change!), plus another kiddo on the way.

    I tend to read a lot, and write a bit, so each year I like to reflect on my favorites.

    Favorite Blog Posts and Articles I Wrote

    I create stuff in a handful of locations—this blog, InfoQ.com, Pivotal blog—and here were the content pieces I liked the most.

    [My Blog] Modern Open Source Messaging: Apache Kafka, RabbitMQ and NATS in Action. This was my most popular blog post this year, by far. Application integration and messaging are experience a renaissance in this age of cloud and microservices, and OSS software is leading the way. If you want to watch my conference presentation that sparked this blog post, head to the BizTalk360 site.

    [My Blog] Trying out the “standard” and “enterprise” templates in Azure Logic Apps. Speaking of app integration, Microsoft turned a corner in 2016 and has its first clear direction in years. Logic Apps is a big part of that future, and I gave the new stuff a spin. FYI, since I wrote the original post, the Enterprise Integration Pack shipped with a slightly changed user experience.

    [My Blog] Characteristics of great managers. I often looked at “management” as a necessary evil, but a good manager actually makes a big difference. Upon reflection, I listed some of the characteristics of my best managers.

    [My Blog] Using Concourse to continuously deliver a Service Bus-powered Java app to Pivotal Cloud Foundry on Azure. 15 years. That’s how long it had been since I touched Java. When I joined Pivotal, the company behind the defacto Java framework called Spring, I committed to re-learning it. Blog posts like this, and my new Pluralsight course, demonstrated that I learned SOMETHING.

    [InfoQ] Outside of my regular InfoQ contributions covering industry news, I ran a series on the topic of “cloud lock-in.” I wrote an article called “Everything is Lock-In: Focus on Switching Costs” and facilitated a rowdy expert roundtable.

    [InfoQ] Wolfram Wants to Deliver “Computation Everywhere” with New Private Cloud. I purposely choose to write about things I’m not familiar with. How else am I supposed to learn? In this case, I dug into the Wolfram offerings a bit, and interviewed a delightful chap.

    [Pivotal] Pivotal Conversations Podcast. You never know what may happen when you say “yes” to something. I agreed to be a guest on a podcast earlier this year, and as a result, my delightfully bearded work colleague Coté asked me to restart the Pivotal podcast with him. Every week we talk about the news, and some tech topic. It’s been one of my favorite things this year.

    [Pivotal] Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Supercharging Your Microservices with NetflixOSS and Spring Cloud. I volunteered to write a whitepaper about microservices scaffolding and Spring Cloud, and here’s the result. It was cool to see thousands of folks check it out.

    [Pivotal blog] 250k Containers In Production: A Real Test For The Real World. Scale matters, and I enjoyed writing up the results of an impressive benchmark by the Cloud Foundry team. While I believe our industry is giving outsized attention to the topic of containers, the people who *should care* about them (i.e. platform builders) want tech they can trust at scale.

    [Pivotal blog] To Avoid Getting Caught In The Developer Skills Gap, Do This. It’s hard to find good help these days. Apparently companies struggle to fill open developer positions, and I offered some advice for closing the skills gap.

    Favorite Books I Read

    I left my trusty Kindle 3 behind on an airplane this year, and replaced it with a new Kindle Paperwhite. Despite this hiccup, I still finished 31 books this year. Here are the best ones I read.

    The Hike. I don’t read much fantasy-type stuff, but I love Drew’s writing and gave this a shot. Not disappointed. Funny, tense, and absurd tale that was one of my favorite books of the year. You’ll never look at crustaceans the same way again.

    The Prey Series. I’m a sucker for mystery/thriller books and thought I’d dig into this  long-running series. Ended up reading the first six of them this year. Compelling protagonist, downright freaky villains.

    The Last Policeman Trilogy. I’m not sure where I saw the recommendation for these books, but I’m glad I did. Just fantastic. I plowed through Book 1, Book 2, and Book 3 in about 10 days. It starts as a “cop solving a mystery even though the world is about to end” and carries onward with a riveting sense of urgency.

    Rubicon: The Last Years of the Roman Republic. I really enjoyed this. Extremely engaging story about a turning point in human history. It was tough keeping all the characters straight after a while, but I have a new appreciation for the time period and the (literally) cutthroat politics.

    The Great Bridge: The Epic Story of the Building of the Brooklyn Bridge. It’s easy to glamorize significant construction projects, but this story does a masterful job showing you the glory *and* pain. I was inspired reading it, so much so that I wrote up a blog post comparing software engineering to bridge-building.

    The Path Between the Seas: The Creation of the Panama Canal, 1870-1914. You’ve gotta invest some serious time to get through McCullough’s books, but I’ve never regretted it. This one is about the tortured history of building the Panama Canal. Just an unbelievable level of effort and loss of life to make it happen. It’s definitely a lesson on preparedness and perseverance.

    The Summer of 1787: The Men Who Invented the Constitution. Instead of only ingesting hot-takes about American history and the Founder’s intent, it’s good to take time to actually read about it! I seem to read an American history book each year, and this one was solid. Good pacing, great details.

    The Liberator: One World War II Soldier’s 500-Day Odyssey from the Beaches of Sicily to the Gates of Dachau. I also seem to read a WWII book every year, and this one really stayed with me. I don’t believe in luck, but it’s hard to attribute this man’s survival to much else. Story of hope, stress, disaster, and bravery.

    Navigating Genesis: A Scientist’s Journey through Genesis 1–11. Intriguing investigation into the overlap between the biblical account and scientific research into the origins of the universe.  Less conflict than you may think.

    Boys Among Men: How the Prep-to-Pro Generation Redefined the NBA and Sparked a Basketball Revolution. I’m a hoops fan, but it’s easy to look at young basketball players as spoiled millionaires. That may be true, but it’s the result of a system that doesn’t set these athletes up for success. Sobering story that reveals how elusive that success really is.

    Yes, My Accent Is Real: And Some Other Things I Haven’t Told You. This was such a charming set of autobiographical essays from The Big Bang Theory’s Kunal Nayyar. It’s an easy read, and one that provides a fun behind-the-scenes look at “making it” in Hollywood.

    Eleven Rings: The Soul of Success. One of my former colleagues, Jim Newkirk, recommended this book from Phil Jackson. Jim said that Jackson’s philosophy influenced how he thinks about software teams. Part autobiography, part leadership guide, this book includes a lot of advice that’s applicable to managers in any profession.

    Disrupted: My Misadventure in the Start-Up Bubble. I laughed, I cried, and then I panicked when I realized that I had just joined a startup myself. Fortunately, Pivotal bore no resemblance to the living caricature that is/was HubSpot. Read this book from Lyons before you jump ship from a meaningful company to a glossy startup.

    Overcomplicated: Technology at the Limits of ComprehensionThe thesis of this book is that we’re building systems that cannot be totally understood. The author then goes into depth explaining how to approach complex systems, how to explore them when things go wrong, and how to use caution when unleashing this complexity on customers.

    Pre-Suasion: A Revolutionary Way to Influence and Persuade. If you were completely shocked by the result of the US presidential election, then you might want to read this book. This election was about persuasion, not policy. The “godfather of persuasion” talks about psychological framing and using privileged moments to impact a person’s choice. Great read for anyone in sales and marketing.

    Impossible to Ignore: Creating Memorable Content to Influence Decisions: Creating Memorable Content to Influence Decisions. How can you influence people’s memories and have them act on what you think is important? That’s what this book attempts to answer. Lots of practical info grounded in research studies. If you’re trying to land a message in a noisy marketplace, you’ll like this book.

    Win Your Case: How to Present, Persuade, and Prevail–Every Place, Every Time. I apparently read a lot about persuasion this  year. This one is targeted at trial lawyers, but many of the same components of influence (e.g. trust, credibility) apply to other audiences.

    The Challenger Customer: Selling to the Hidden Influencer Who Can Multiply Your Results. Thought-provoking stuff here. The author’s assertion is that the hard part of selling today isn’t about the supplier struggling to sell their product, but about the customer’s struggle to buy them. An average of 5.4 people are involved in purchasing decisions, and it’s about using “commercial insight” to help them create consensus early on.

    The DevOps Handbook: How to Create World-Class Agility, Reliability, and Security in Technology Organizations. This is the new companion book to the DevOps classic, The Phoenix Project. It contains tons of advice for those trying to change culture and instill a delivery mindset within the organization. It’s full of case studies from companies small and large. Highly recommended.

    Start and Scaling DevOps in the Enterprise. Working at Pivotal, this is one of the questions we hear most from Global 2000 companies: how do I scale agile/DevOps practices to my whole organization? This short book tackles that question with some practical guidance and relevant examples.

    A sincere thanks to all of you for reading my blog, watching my Pluralsight courses, and engaging me on Twitter in 2016. I am such a better technologist and human because of these interactions with so many interesting people!

  • Using Concourse to continuously deliver a Service Bus-powered Java app to Pivotal Cloud Foundry on Azure

    Using Concourse to continuously deliver a Service Bus-powered Java app to Pivotal Cloud Foundry on Azure

    Guess what? Deep down, cloud providers know you’re not moving your whole tech portfolio to their public cloud any time soon. Oh, your transition is probably underway, but you’ve got a whole stash of apps, data stores, and services that may not move for a while. That’s cool. There are more and more patterns and services available to squeeze value out of existing apps by extending them with more modern, scalable, cloudy tech. For instance, how might you take an existing payment transfer system that did B2B transactions and open it up to consumers without requiring your team to do a complete rewrite? One option might be to add a load-leveling queue in front of it, and take in requests via a scalable, cloud-based front-end app. In this post, I’ll show you how to implement that pattern by writing a Spring Boot app that uses Azure Service Bus Queues. Then, I’ll build a Concourse deployment pipeline to ship the app to Pivotal Cloud Foundry running atop Microsoft Azure.

    2016-11-28-azure-boot-01

    Ok, but why use a platform on top of Azure?

    That’s a fair question. Why not just use native Azure (or AWS, or Google Cloud Platform) services instead of putting a platform overlay like Pivotal Cloud Foundry atop it? Two reasons: app-centric workflow for developers, and “day 2” operations at scale.

    Most every cloud platform started off by automating infrastructure. That’s their view of the world, and it still seeps into most of their cloud app services. There’s no fundamental problem with that, except that many developers (“full stack” or otherwise) aren’t infrastructure pros. They want to build and ship great apps for customers. Everything else is a distraction. A platform such as Pivotal Cloud Foundry is entirely application-focused. Instead of the developer finding an app host, packaging the app, deploying the app, setting up a load balancer, configuring DNS, hooking up log collection, and configuring monitoring, the Cloud Foundry dev just cranks out an app and does a single action to get everything correctly configured in the cloud. And it’s an identical experience whether Pivotal Cloud Foundry is deployed to Azure, AWS, OpenStack, or whatever. The smartest companies realized that their developers should be exceptional at writing customer-facing software, not configuring firewall rules and container orchestration.

    Secondly, it’s about “day 2” operations. You know, all the stuff that happens to actually maintain apps in production. I have no doubt that any of you can build an app and quickly get it to cloud platforms like Azure Web Sites or Heroku with zero trouble. But what about when there are a dozen apps, or thousands? How about when it’s not just you, but a hundred of your fellow devs? Most existing app-centric platforms just aren’t set up to be org-wide, and you end up with costly inconsistencies between teams. With something like Pivotal Cloud Foundry, you have a resilient, distributed system that supports every major programing language, and provides a set of consistent patterns for app deployment, logging, scaling, monitoring, and more. Some of the biggest companies in the world deploy thousands of apps to their respective environments today, and we just proved that the platform can handle 250,000 containers with no problem. It’s about operations at scale.

    With that out of the way, let’s see what I built.

    Step 1 – Prerequisites

    Before building my app, I had to set up a few things.

    • Azure account. This is kind of important for a demo of things running on Azure. Microsoft provides a free trial, so take it for a spin if you haven’t already. I’ve had my account for quite a while, so all my things for this demo hang out there.
    • GitHub account. The Concourse continuous integration software knows how to talk to a few things, and git is one of them. So, I stored my app code in GitHub and had Concourse monitoring it for changes.
    • Amazon account. I know, I know, an Azure demo shouldn’t use AWS. But, Amazon S3 is a ubiquitous object store, and Concourse made it easy to drop my binaries there after running my continuous integration process.
    • Pivotal Cloud Foundry (PCF). You can find this in the Azure marketplace, and technically, this demo works with PCF running anywhere. I’ve got a full PCF on Azure environment available, and used that here.
    • Azure Service Broker. One fundamental concept in Cloud Foundry is a “service broker.” Service brokers advertise a catalog of services to app developers, and provide a consistent way to provision and de-provision the service. They also “bind” services to an app, which puts things like service credentials into that app’s environment variables for easy access. Microsoft built a service broker for Azure, and it works for DocumentDB, Azure Storage, Redis Cache, SQL Database, and the Service Bus. I installed this into my PCF-on-Azure environment, but you can technically run it on any PCF installation.

    Step 2 – Build Spring Boot App

    In my fictitious example, I wanted a Java front-end app that mobile clients interact with. That microservice drops messages into an Azure Service Bus Queue so that the existing on-premises app can pull messages from at their convenience, and thus avoid getting swamped by all this new internet traffic.

    Why Java? Java continues to be very popular in enterprises, and Spring Boot along with Spring Cloud (both maintained by Pivotal) have completely modernized the Java experience. Microsoft believes that PCF helps companies get a first-class Java experience on Azure.

    I used Spring Tool Suite to build a new Spring Boot MVC app with “web” and “thymeleaf” dependencies. Note that you can find all my code in GitHub if you’d like to reproduce this.

    To start with, I created a model class for the web app. This “web payment” class represents the data I connected from the user and passed on to the Service Bus Queue.

    package seroter.demo;
    
    public class WebPayment {
    	private String fromAccount;
    	private String toAccount;
    	private long transferAmount;
    
    	public String getFromAccount() {
    		return fromAccount;
    	}
    
    	public void setFromAccount(String fromAccount) {
    		this.fromAccount = fromAccount;
    	}
    
    	public String getToAccount() {
    		return toAccount;
    	}
    
    	public void setToAccount(String toAccount) {
    		this.toAccount = toAccount;
    	}
    
    	public long getTransferAmount() {
    		return transferAmount;
    	}
    
    	public void setTransferAmount(long transferAmount) {
    		this.transferAmount = transferAmount;
    	}
    }
    

    Next up, I built a bean that my web controller used to talk to the Azure Service Bus. Microsoft has an official Java SDK in the Maven repository, so I added this to my project.

    2016-11-28-azure-boot-03

    Within this object, I referred to the VCAP_SERVICES environment variable that I would soon get by binding my app to the Azure service. I used that environment variable to yank out the credentials for the Service Bus namespace, and then created the queue if it didn’t exist already.

    @Configuration
    public class SbConfig {
    
     @Bean
     ServiceBusContract serviceBusContract() {
    
       //grab env variable that comes from binding CF app to the Azure service
       String vcap = System.getenv("VCAP_SERVICES");
    
       //parse the JSON in the environment variable
       JsonParser jsonParser = JsonParserFactory.getJsonParser();
       Map<String, Object> jsonMap = jsonParser.parseMap(vcap);
    
       //create map of values for service bus creds
       Map<String,Object> creds = (Map<String,Object>)((List<Map<String, Object>>)jsonMap.get("seroter-azureservicebus")).get(0).get("credentials");
    
       //create service bus config object
       com.microsoft.windowsazure.Configuration config =
    	ServiceBusConfiguration.configureWithSASAuthentication(
    		creds.get("namespace_name").toString(),
    		creds.get("shared_access_key_name").toString(),
    		creds.get("shared_access_key_value").toString(),
    		".servicebus.windows.net");
    
       //create object used for interacting with service bus
       ServiceBusContract svc = ServiceBusService.create(config);
       System.out.println("created service bus contract ...");
    
       //check if queue exists
       try {
    	ListQueuesResult r = svc.listQueues();
    	List<QueueInfo> qi = r.getItems();
    	boolean hasQueue = false;
    
    	for (QueueInfo queueInfo : qi) {
              System.out.println("queue is " + queueInfo.getPath());
    
    	  //queue exist already?
    	  if(queueInfo.getPath().equals("demoqueue"))  {
    		System.out.println("Queue already exists");
    		hasQueue = true;
    		break;
    	   }
    	 }
    
    	if(!hasQueue) {
    	//create queue because we didn't find it
    	  try {
    	    QueueInfo q = new QueueInfo("demoqueue");
                CreateQueueResult result = svc.createQueue(q);
    	    System.out.println("queue created");
    	  }
    	  catch(ServiceException createException) {
    	    System.out.println("Error: " + createException.getMessage());
    	  }
            }
        }
        catch (ServiceException findException) {
           System.out.println("Error: " + findException.getMessage());
         }
        return svc;
       }
    }
    

    Cool. Now I could connect to the Service Bus. All that was left was my actual web controller that returned views, and sent messages to the Service Bus. One of my operations returned the data collection view, and the other handled form submissions and sent messages to the queue via the @autowired ServiceBusContract object.

    @SpringBootApplication
    @Controller
    public class SpringbootAzureConcourseApplication {
    
       public static void main(String[] args) {
         SpringApplication.run(SpringbootAzureConcourseApplication.class, args);
       }
    
       //pull in autowired bean with service bus connection
       @Autowired
       ServiceBusContract serviceBusContract;
    
       @GetMapping("/")
       public String showPaymentForm(Model m) {
    
          //add webpayment object to view
          m.addAttribute("webpayment", new WebPayment());
    
          //return view name
          return "webpayment";
       }
    
       @PostMapping("/")
       public String paymentSubmit(@ModelAttribute WebPayment webpayment) {
    
          try {
             //convert webpayment object to JSON to send to queue
    	 ObjectMapper om = new ObjectMapper();
    	 String jsonPayload = om.writeValueAsString(webpayment);
    
    	 //create brokered message wrapper used by service bus
    	 BrokeredMessage m = new BrokeredMessage(jsonPayload);
    	 //send to queue
    	 serviceBusContract.sendMessage("demoqueue", m);
    	 System.out.println("message sent");
    
          }
          catch (ServiceException e) {
    	 System.out.println("error sending to queue - " + e.getMessage());
          }
          catch (JsonProcessingException e) {
    	 System.out.println("error converting payload - " + e.getMessage());
          }
    
          return "paymentconfirm";
       }
    }
    

    With that, my microservice was done. Spring Boot makes it silly easy to crank out apps, and the Azure SDK was pretty straightforward to use.

    Step 3 – Deploy and Test App

    Developers use the “cf” command line interface to interact with Cloud Foundry environments. Running a “cf marketplace” command shows all the services advertised by registered service brokers. Since I added the Azure Service Broker to my environment, I instantiated an instance of the Service Bus service to my Cloud Foundry org. To tell the Azure Service Broker what to actually create, I built a simple JSON document that outlined the Azure resource group. region, and service.

    {
      "resource_group_name": "pivotaldemorg",
      "namespace_name": "seroter-boot",
      "location": "westus",
      "type": "Messaging",
      "messaging_tier": "Standard"
    }
    

    By using the Azure Service Broker, I didn’t have to go into the Azure Portal for any reason. I could automate the entire lifecycle of a native Azure service. The command below created a new Service Bus namespace, and made the credentials available to any app that binds to it.

    cf create-service seroter-azureservicebus default seroterservicebus -c sb.json
    

    After running this, my PCF environment had a service instance (seroterservicebus) ready to be bound to an app. I also confirmed that the Azure Portal showed a new namespace, and no queues (yet).

    2016-11-28-azure-boot-06

    Awesome. Next, I added a “manifest” that described my Cloud Foundry app. This manifest specified the app name, how many instances (containers) to spin up, where to get the binary (jar) to deploy, and which service instance (seroterservicebus) to bind to.

    ---
    applications:
    - name: seroter-boot-azure
      memory: 256M
      instances: 2
      path: target/springboot-azure-concourse-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
      buildpack: https://github.com/cloudfoundry/java-buildpack.git
      services:
        - seroterservicebus
    

    By doing a “cf push” to my PCF-on-Azure environment, the platform took care of all the app packaging, container creation, firewall updates, DNS changes, log setup, and more. After a few seconds, I had a highly-available front end app bound to the Service Bus. Below that you can see I had an app started with two instances, and the service was bound to my new app.

    2016-11-28-azure-boot-07

    All that was left was to test it. I fired up the app’s default view, and filled in a few values to initiate a money transfer.

    2016-11-28-azure-boot-08

    After submitting, I saw that there was a new message in my queue. I built another Spring Boot app (to simulate an extension of my legacy “payments” system) that pulled from the queue. This app ran on my desktop and logged the message from the Azure Service Bus.

    2016-11-28-azure-boot-09

    That’s great. I added a mature, highly-available queue in between my cloud-native Java web app, and my existing line-of-business system. With this pattern, I could accept all kinds of new traffic without overloading the backend system.

    Step 4 – Build Concourse Pipeline

    We’re not done yet! I promised continuous delivery, and I deliver on my promises, dammit.

    To build my deployment process, I used Concourse, a pipeline-oriented continuous integration and delivery tool that’s easy to use and amazingly portable. Instead of wizard-based tools that use fixed environments, Concourse uses pipelines defined in configuration files and executed in ephemeral containers. No conflicts with previous builds, no snowflake servers that are hard to recreate. And, it has a great UI that makes it obvious when there are build issues.

    I downloaded a Vagrant virtual machine image with Concourse pre-configured. Then I downloaded the lightweight command line interface (called Fly) for interacting with pipelines.

    My “build and deploy” process consisted of four files: bootpipeline.yml that contained the core pipeline, build.yml which set up the Java build process, build.sh which actually performs the build, and secure.yml which holds my credentials (and isn’t checked into GitHub).

    The build.sh file clones my GitHub repo (defined as a resource in the main pipeline) and does a maven install.

    #!/usr/bin/env bash
    
    set -e -x
    
    git clone resource-seroter-repo resource-app
    
    cd resource-app
    
    mvn clean
    
    mvn install
    

    The build.yml file showed that I’m using the Maven Docker image to build my code, and points to the build.sh file to actually build the app.

    ---
    platform: linux
    
    image_resource:
      type: docker-image
      source:
        repository: maven
        tag: latest
    
    inputs:
      - name: resource-seroter-repo
    
    outputs:
      - name: resource-app
    
    run:
      path: resource-seroter-repo/ci/build.sh
    

    Finally, let’s look at my build pipeline. Here, I defined a handful of “resources” that my pipeline interacts with. I’ve got my GitHub repo, an Amazon S3 bucket to store the JAR file, and my PCF-on-Azure environment. Then, I have two jobs: one that builds my code and puts the result into S3, and another that takes the JAR from S3 (and manifest from GitHub) and pushes to PCF on Azure.

    ---
    resources:
    # resource for my GitHub repo
    - name: resource-seroter-repo
      type: git
      source:
        uri: https://github.com/rseroter/springboot-azure-concourse.git
        branch: master
    #resource for my S3 bucket to store the binary
    - name: resource-s3
      type: s3
      source:
        bucket: spring-demo
        region_name: us-west-2
        regexp: springboot-azure-concourse-(.*).jar
        access_key_id: {{s3-key-id}}
        secret_access_key: {{s3-access-key}}
    # resource for my Cloud Foundry target
    - name: resource-azure
      type: cf
      source:
        api: {{cf-api}}
        username: {{cf-username}}
        password: {{cf-password}}
        organization: {{cf-org}}
        space: {{cf-space}}
    
    jobs:
    - name: build-binary
      plan:
        - get: resource-seroter-repo
          trigger: true
        - task: build-task
          privileged: true
          file: resource-seroter-repo/ci/build.yml
        - put: resource-s3
          params:
            file: resource-app/target/springboot-azure-concourse-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
    
    - name: deploy-to-prod
      plan:
        - get: resource-s3
          trigger: true
          passed: [build-binary]
        - get: resource-seroter-repo
        - put: resource-azure
          params:
            manifest: resource-seroter-repo/manifest-ci.yml
    

    I was now ready to deploy my pipeline and see the magic.

    After spinning up the Concourse Vagrant box, I hit the default URL and saw that I didn’t have any pipelines. NOT SURPRISING.

    2016-11-28-azure-boot-10

    From my Terminal, I used Fly CLI commands to deploy a pipeline. Note that I referred again to the “secure.yml” file containing credentials that get injected into the pipeline definition at deploy time.

    fly -t lite set-pipeline --pipeline azure-pipeline --config bootpipeline.yml --load-vars-from secure.yml
    

    In a second or two, a new (paused) pipeline popped up in Concourse. As you can see below, this tool is VERY visual. It’s easy to see how Concourse interpreted my pipeline definition and connected resources to jobs.

    2016-11-28-azure-boot-11

    I then un-paused the pipeline with this command:

    fly -t lite unpause-pipeline --pipeline azure-pipeline
    

    Immediately, the pipeline started up, retrieved my code from GitHub, built the app within a Docker container, dropped the result into S3, and deployed to PCF on Azure.

    2016-11-28-azure-boot-12

    After Concourse finished running the pipeline, I checked the PCF Application Manager UI and saw my new app up and running. Think about what just happened: I didn’t have to muck with any infrastructure or open any tickets to get an app from dev to production. Wonderful.

    2016-11-28-azure-boot-14

    The way I built this pipeline, I didn’t version the JAR when I built my app. In reality, you’d want to use the semantic versioning resource to bump the version on each build. Because of the way I designed this, the second job (“deploy to PCF”) won’t fire automatically after the first build, since there technically isn’t a new artifact in the S3 bucket. A cool side effect of this is that I could constantly do continuous integration, and then choose to manually deploy (clicking the “+” button below) when the company was ready for the new version to go to production. Continuous delivery, not deployment.

    2016-11-28-azure-boot-13

    Wrap Up

    Whew. That was a big demo. But in the scheme of things, it was pretty straightforward. I used some best-of-breed services from Azure within my Java app, and then pushed that app to Pivotal Cloud Foundry entirely through automation. Now, every time I check in a code change to GitHub, Concourse will automatically build the app. When I choose to, I take the latest build and tell Concourse to send it to production.

    magic

    A platform like PCF helps companies solve their #1 problem with becoming software-driven: improving their deployment pipeline. Try to keep your focus on apps not infrastructure, and make sure that whatever platform you use, you focus on sustainable operations at scale!

     

  • My new Pluralsight course—Developing Java microservices with Spring Cloud—is now available

    Java is back. To be sure, it never really left, but it did appear to take a backseat during the past decade. While new, lightweight, mobile-friendly languages rose to prominence, Java—saddled with cumbersome frameworks and an uncertain future—seemed destined to be used only by the most traditional of enterprises.

    But that didn’t happen. It wasn’t just enterprises that depended on Java, but innovative startups. And heavyweight Java frameworks evolved into more approachable, simple-to-use tools. Case in point: the open-source Spring dependency injection framework. Spring’s been a mainstay of Java development for years, but its XML-heavy configuration model made it increasingly unwieldy. Enter Spring Boot in 2014. Spring Boot introduced an opinionated, convention-over-configuration model to Spring and instantly improved developer productivity. And now, companies large and small are using it at an astonishing rate.

    Spring Cloud followed in 2015. This open-source project included a host of capabilities—including a number of projects from Netflix engineering—for teams building modern web apps and distributed systems. It’s now downloaded hundreds of thousands of times per month.

    Behind all this Spring goodness is Pivotal, the company I work for. We’re the primary sponsor of Spring and after joining Pivotal in April, I thought it’d be fun to teach a course on these technologies. There’s just so much going on in Spring Cloud, that I’m doing a two-partner. First up: Java Microservices with Spring Cloud: Developing Services.

    In this five-hour course, we look at some of the Spring Cloud projects that help you build modern microservices. In the second part of the course (which I’m starting on soon), we’ll dig into the Spring Cloud projects that help you coordinate interactions between microservices (think load balancing, circuit breakers, messaging). So what’s in this current course? It’s got five action-packed modules:

    1. Introduction to Microservices, Spring Boot, and Spring Cloud. Here we talk about the core characteristics of microservices, describe Spring Boot, build a quick sample app using Spring Boot, walk through the Spring Cloud projects, and review the apps we’ll build throughout the course.
    2. Simplifying Environment Managed with Centralized Config. Spring Cloud Config makes it super easy to stand up and consume a Git-backed configuration store. In this module we see how to create a Config Server, review all the ways to query configs, see how to setup secure access, work to configure encryption, and more. What’s cool is that the Config Server is HTTP accessible, so while it’s simple to consume in Spring Boot apps with annotated variables, it’s almost just as easy to consume from ANY other type of app.
    3. Offloading Async Activities with Lightweight, Short-Lived Tasks. Modern software teams don’t just build web apps. No, more and more microservices are being built as short-lived, serverless activities. Here, we look at Spring Cloud Task explore how to build event-driven services that get instantiated, do their work, and gracefully shut down. We see how to build Tasks, store their execution history in a MySQL database, and even build a Task that gets instantiated by an HTTP-initiated message to RabbitMQ.
    4. Securing Your Microservices with a Declarative Model. As an industry, we keep SAYING that security is important in our apps, but it still seems to be an area of neglect. Spring Cloud Security is for teams that recognize the challenge of applying traditional security approaches to microservices, and want an authorization scheme that scales. In this module we talk about OAuth 2.0, see how to perform Authorization Code flows, build our own resource server and flow tokens between services, and even build a custom authorization server. Through it all, we see how to add annotations to code that secure our services with minimal fuss.
    5. Chasing Down Performance Issues Using Distributed Tracing. One of the underrated challenges of building microservices is recognizing the impact of latency on a distributed architecture. Where are there problems? Did we create service interactions that are suboptimal? Here, we look at Spring Cloud Sleuth for automatic instrumentation of virtually EVERY communication path. Then we see how Zipkin surfaces latency issues and lets you instantly visualize the bottlenecks.

    This course was a labor of love for the last 6 months. I learned a ton, and I think I’ve documented and explained things that are difficult to find elsewhere in one place. If you’re a Java dev or looking to add some cloud-native patterns to your microservices, I hope you’ll jet over to Pluralsight and check this course out!

  • Characteristics of great managers

    Take a moment and think about the best manager that you’ve had. I’ll wait. Now, think about the worst manager you’ve had. What characteristics separate the two?

    It’s said that people don’t leave companies, they leave managers. Sure, that happens. So if you’re a manager, how can you keep your employees from “firing” you? If you have a boss, how do you know it’s time to give them the boot?

    While walking my dogs the other night, I mentally stack-ranked the managers I’ve had in my career and tried to think about what made the top managers (and bottom managers) stand out. Below you’ll find the characteristics of my favorite managers. If you agree or disagree, I’d love to hear in the comments!

    Accessible. The best managers are there when you need them. They are reachable, and responsive to email/Slack/whatever. It’s a sign of respect for the team, and indicates that they manage their time well. If you can’t ever seem to get a hold of your manager, that’s a warning sign.

    Provides unsolicited, genuine feedback. We all want to know that we’re on the right (or wrong!) track. I always appreciate when my manager gives me occasional, constructive feedback. In addition, we’re not robots, so unexpected “thanks!” or “good job” are appreciated.

    Dependable. A good manager shows up for scheduled meetings, keeps 1:1 sessions on the calendar at all costs, and can be counted on to participate in time-sensitive conversations. In my opinion, this is table stakes for being in management. If your team can’t count on you, it’s a signal that you’re ill-equipped for the job.

    Measures outcomes, not motion. “Hours worked” is a lousy measurement of value. I’m thrilled when I have a manager that doesn’t care how many hours I worked, how many meetings I had, or how many emails I sent. It just doesn’t matter. What matters is outcomes and whether I delivered something useful. Good managers get that.

    Significant domain knowledge. It’s great when a manager is actually smart about the topic her team owns. I know that’s not always the case with high-level executives who get rotated through positions, but my best managers are the ones that can help me work through challenges because they know the problem space better than I do.

    Demonstrates expertise and creates insightful material. This relates to “domain knowledge” above, but I really like when my manager is a producer, not just a consumer. I want my manager presenting at conferences, creating presentations, writing blog posts, etc. It sets a great example for the team and demonstrates that they care about being knowledgeable in the team’s domain.

    Positive attitude. Look, I’m sarcastic and appreciate gallows humor, but I’m also a happy person and like working for people that have a realistic optimism. Good managers create a positive vibe within the team and company as a whole. Conversely, a lousy manager dwells on mistakes or unnecessarily creates uncertainty by focusing on the potential for negative outcomes.

    Collaborates and trusts, doesn’t dictate. Good managers trust their team. They see their direct reports as colleagues to learn from and partner with, not underlings to boss around. These managers use a “trust but verify” approach instead of a micro-management approach.

    Decisive and makes hard choices. To me, there’s almost nothing worse than a wishy-washy boss who can’t make decisions and shies away from tricky situations. Good managers know it’s their responsibility to remove uncertainty and make thoughtful decisions quickly. The opposite crushes morale and makes the manager appear incompetent.

    Defines success and provides focus when needed. I’m pretty self-sufficient and abhor micro-management. But, we all like to know how we’re being measured and what matters to the company! My best managers were crystal clear about their expectations of me, and if needed, kept me focused on those objectives if I got distracted.

    Takes time to understand my motivations, and provides assignments that help me grow. It can be easy for managers to pigeonhole an employee into one responsibility area. My best managers let me take on stretch assignments and pursue areas of interest, and didn’t live in fear that I’d pursue other opportunities outside the team.

    Celebrates team success without stealing credit. A confident manager doesn’t feel the need to take sole credit for the work their team does. Rather, these managers pause to identify individual accomplishments, and make sure that others in the organization know who did the work.

    Stands up for the team. Some of my favorite managers were those that saw themselves as coaches and advocates for their team. They didn’t badmouth their team or blame them for their own problems. Rather, they lifted them up and defended them as needed. Look at Seattle Seahawks coach Pete Carroll. This past week, his field goal kicker missed a chip shot that cost the team a win. Instead of blasting the kicker for blowing the game, Carroll praised the kicker’s overall contribution and let everyone know that “he’s our guy.” Who wouldn’t want to work for that kind of boss?

    Gives more than they take. My worst manager asked me for lots of random things, and offered no value in return. It was a completely one-sided relationship. Conversely, my best managers were full of good ideas, solutions to problems, and useful advice. I actively looked forward to talking to them!

    Inspires my best performance. A good manager makes it clear why my work matters, and how the company is making a difference for customers. This often requires them to be strong communicators, or at least authentic ones. I don’t want forced cheerleading; I want someone who can motivate teams through the lulls, while putting the team’s contribution into perspective.

    Hopefully you work for a manager that checks all the boxes above. Life is too short to work for a lousy boss! If you’re a manager yourself, don’t take your position for granted, and make sure that you inspire your team and set them up for growth and success.

    Are there other “must have” characteristics for your manager, or items below you don’t really care about? I’d love to hear.

  • Using Steeltoe for ASP.NET 4.x apps that need a microservices-friendly config store

    Using Steeltoe for ASP.NET 4.x apps that need a microservices-friendly config store

    Nowadays, all the cool kids are doing microservices. Whether or not you care, there ARE some really nice distributed systems patterns that have emerged from this movement. Netflix and others have shared novel solutions for preventing cascading failures, discovering services at runtime, performing client-side load balancing, and storing configurations off-box. For Java developers, many of these patterns have been baked into turnkey components as part of Spring Cloud. But what about .NET devs who want access to all this goodness? Enter Steeltoe.

    Steeltoe is an open-source .NET project that gives .NET Framework and .NET Core developers easy access to Spring Cloud services like Spring Cloud Config (Git-backed config server) and Spring Cloud Eureka (service discovery from Netflix). In this blog post, I’ll show you how easy it is to create a config server, and then connect to it from an ASP.NET app using Steeltoe.

    Why should .NET devs care about a config server? We’ve historically thrown our (sometimes encrypted) config values into web.config files or a database. Kevin Hoffman says that’s now an anti-pattern because you end up with mutable build artifacts and don’t have an easy way to rotate encryption keys. With fast-changing (micro)services, and more host environments than ever, a strong config strategy is a must. Spring Cloud Config gives you a web-scale config server that supports Git-backed configurations,  symmetric or asymmetric encryption, access security, and no-restart client refreshes.

    Many Steeltoe demos I’ve seen use .NET Core as the runtime, but my non-scientific estimate is that 99.991% of all .NET apps out there are .NET 4.x and earlier, so let’s build a demo with a Windows stack.

    Before starting to build the app, I needed actual config files! Spring Cloud Config works with local files, or preferably, a Git repo. I created a handful of files in a GitHub repository that represent values for an “inventory service” app. I have one file for dev, QA, and production environments. These can be YAML files or property files.

    2016-10-18-steeltoe07

    Let’s code stuff. I went and built a simple Spring Cloud Config server using Spring Tool Suite. To say “built” is to overstate how silly easy it is to do. Whether using Spring Tool Suite or the fantastic Spring Initializr site, if it takes you more than six minutes to build a config server, you must be extremely drunk.

    2016-10-18-steeltoe01

    Next, I chose which dependencies to add to the project. I selected the Config Server, which is part of Spring Cloud.

    2016-10-18-steeltoe02

    With my app scaffolding done, I added a ton of code to serve up config server endpoints, define encryption/decryption logic, and enable auto-refresh of clients. Just kidding. It takes a single annotation on my main Java class:

    import org.springframework.boot.SpringApplication;
    import org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.SpringBootApplication;
    import org.springframework.cloud.config.server.EnableConfigServer;
    
    @SpringBootApplication
    @EnableConfigServer
    public class BlogConfigserverApplication {
    
    	public static void main(String[] args) {
    		SpringApplication.run(BlogConfigserverApplication.class, args);
    	}
    }
    

    Ok, there’s got to be more than that, right? Yes, I’m not being entirely honest. I also had to throw this line into my application.properties file so that the config server knew where to pull my GitHub-based configuration files.

    spring.cloud.config.server.git.uri=https://github.com/rseroter/blog-configserver
    

    That’s it for a basic config server. Now, there are tons of other things you CAN configure around access security, multiple source repos, search paths, and more. But this is a good starting point. I quickly tested my config server using Postman and saw that by just changing the profile (dev/qa/default) in the URL, I’d pull up a different config file from GitHub. Spring Cloud Config makes it easy to use one or more repos to serve up configurations for different apps representing different environments. Sweet.

    2016-10-18-steeltoe03

    Ok, so I had a config server. Next up? Using Steeltoe so that my ASP.NET 4.6 app could easily retrieve config values from this server.

    I built a new ASP.NET MVC app in Visual Studio 2015.

    2016-10-18-steeltoe04

    Next, I searched NuGet for Steeltoe, and found the configuration server library.

    2016-10-18-steeltoe05

    Fortunately .NET has some extension points for plugging in an outside configuration source. First, I created a new appsettings.json file at the root of the project. This file describes a few settings that help map to the right config values on the server. Specifically, the name of the app and URL of the config server. FYI, the app name corresponds to the config file name in GitHub. What about whether we’re using dev, test, or prod? Hold on, I’m getting there dammit.

    {
        "spring": {
            "application": {
               "name": "inventoryservice"
             },
            "cloud": {
               "config": {
                 "uri": "[my ip address]:8080"
               }
            }
        }
    }
    

    Next up, I created the class in the “App_Start” project folder that holds the details of our configuration, and looks to the appsettings.json file for some pointers. I stole this class from the nice Steeltoe demos, so don’t give me credit for being smart.

    using System;
    using System.Collections.Generic;
    using System.Linq;
    using System.Web;
    
    //added by me
    using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Hosting;
    using System.IO;
    using Microsoft.Extensions.FileProviders;
    using Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration;
    using Steeltoe.Extensions.Configuration;
    
    namespace InventoryService
    {
        public class ConfigServerConfig
        {
            public static IConfigurationRoot Configuration { get; set; }
    
            public static void RegisterConfig(string environment)
            {
                var env = new HostingEnvironment(environment);
    
                // Set up configuration sources.
                var builder = new ConfigurationBuilder()
                    .SetBasePath(AppDomain.CurrentDomain.BaseDirectory)
                    .AddJsonFile("appsettings.json")
                    .AddConfigServer(env);
    
                Configuration = builder.Build();
            }
        }
        public class HostingEnvironment : IHostingEnvironment
        {
            public HostingEnvironment(string env)
            {
                EnvironmentName = env;
            }
    
            public string ApplicationName
            {
                get
                {
                    throw new NotImplementedException();
                }
    
                set
                {
                    throw new NotImplementedException();
                }
            }
    
            public IFileProvider ContentRootFileProvider
            {
                get
                {
                    throw new NotImplementedException();
                }
    
                set
                {
                    throw new NotImplementedException();
                }
            }
    
            public string ContentRootPath
            {
                get
                {
                    throw new NotImplementedException();
                }
    
                set
                {
                    throw new NotImplementedException();
                }
            }
    
            public string EnvironmentName { get; set; }
    
            public IFileProvider WebRootFileProvider { get; set; }
    
            public string WebRootPath { get; set; }
    
            IFileProvider IHostingEnvironment.WebRootFileProvider
            {
                get
                {
                    throw new NotImplementedException();
                }
    
                set
                {
                    throw new NotImplementedException();
                }
            }
        }
    }
    

    Nearly done! In the Global.asax.cs file, I needed to select which “environment” to use for my configurations. Here, I chose the “default” environment for my app. This means that the Config Server will return the default profile (configuration file) for my application.

    protected void Application_Start()
    {
      AreaRegistration.RegisterAllAreas();
      RouteConfig.RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
    
      //add for config server, contains "profile" used
      ConfigServerConfig.RegisterConfig("default");
    }
    

    Ok, now to the regular ASP.NET MVC stuff. I added a new HomeController for the app, and looked into the configuration for my config value. If it was there, I added it to the ViewBag.

    public ActionResult Index()
    {
       var config = ConfigServerConfig.Configuration;
       if (null != config)
       {
           ViewBag.dbserver = config["dbserver"] ?? "server missing :(";
       }
    
       return View();
    }
    

    All that was left was to build a View to show the glorious result. I added a new Index.cshtml file and just printed out the value from the ViewBag. After starting up the app, I saw that the value printed out matches the value in the corresponding GitHub file:

    2016-10-18-steeltoe06

    If you’re a .NET dev like me, you’ll love Steeltoe. It’s easy to use and provides a much more robust, secure solution for app configurations. And while I think it’s best to run .NET apps in Pivotal Cloud Foundry, you can run these Steeltoe-powered .NET services anywhere you want.

    Steeltoe is still in a pre-release mode, so try it out, submit GitHub issues, and give the team feedback on what else you’d like to see in the library.

  • 12 ways that software engineering is like bridgebuilding

    12 ways that software engineering is like bridgebuilding

    Brooklyn Bridge. By Postdlf at the English language Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1148431I just finished reading “The Great Bridge: The Epic Story of the Building of the Brooklyn Bridge” by David McCullough. It’s a long, intriguing story that it inspired parts of my new whitepaper about Netflix OSS. My buddy James liked my linkage between bridgebuilding and software engineering.

    https://twitter.com/jetpack/status/781919565831954432

    To be sure, software teams rarely take fourteen years to deliver a final product and the stakes may be different. But there are some fundamental lessons learned from the construction of the Brooklyn Bridge that apply to us in the software business.

    Lesson 1 – You need a strong lead engineer

    The original architect of the Brooklyn Bridge was John Roebling. He died before construction started, and his son Washington took over as chief engineer. Washington was also considered an expert in the field, and his experience and attention to detail established him as the authority on the project. However, he also brought on talented lieutenants who managed many of the day-to-day activities. Roebling was extremely hands on and stayed actively engaged, even when he became home-bound due to illness.

    On software projects, you also need an accomplished, hands-on engineering leader. I’m all for self-organizing teams, but you also expect that someone rises to the top and helps direct the effort. At the same time, there should be many leaders on a team who can step in for the lead engineer or own sub-activities without any oversight.

    Lesson 2- Seek out best practices from your peers

    I started off my whitepaper with an anecdote about the lack of knowledge sharing among bridgebuilders. Back then, engineers weren’t inclined to share their best practices and the field was quite competitive. However, Roebling did go to Europe for a year to learn about the latest advances in bridgebuilding, and found a number of willing collaborators. He brought that knowledge home and applied it in ways that were uncommon in the U.S.

    Likewise, software teams can’t operate in a vacuum. Now more than ever, there are significant advances in software architecture patterns and technologies, and we need to seek out our peers and learn from their experience. Go to conferences, read blogs, follow people on Twitter. If you only source ideas from in-house folks, you’re in trouble.

    Lesson 3 – Visible progress builds momentum

    There were MANY parties who objected to the construction of the Brooklyn Bridge. Chiefly, the existing water-based shipping and transportation industries that stood to get disrupted by this hulking bridge crossing the river. People wouldn’t need ferries to get to Brooklyn, and some tall ships might not be able to make it under the bridge. Once the massive bridge towers started taking shape, momentum for the bridge increased. People felt a sense of ownership of this magnificent structure and it was harder to claim that the bridge would be a failure or wasn’t worth doing.

    Software can be disruptive. Not just to competitors, but within the company itself. Antibodies within a company swarm to disruptive changes and try to put a halt to them because it upends their comfortable status quo. Software teams can’t get bogged down in lengthy design periods, as the apparent lack of progress threatens to derail their effort. Ship early and often to build momentum and create the perception of unstoppable progress.

    Lesson 4 – Respect the physical dangers of your work

    As you can imagine, building a bridge is dangerous. Especially 120+ years ago. During construction of the Brooklyn Bridge, a number of people were killed or injured. Some were killed when they ignored safety protocols, and many were injured due to accidents. And dozens experienced temporary, partial paralysis due to “caisson disease” because no one understood the impact of working deep underwater.

    Building software has its own dangers. While I doubt you face risks of multi-ton blocks of granite falling on you—unless you work in a peculiar open-office design—there are real health risks associated with modern software development. Listen to John Willis talk about burnout. It’s sobering. As a software industry, we often, stupidly, celebrate how many hours a team worked or how little sleep they got to deliver a project. Putting people in a high-stress environment for weeks or months on end is mentally AND physically dangerous. Recognize that, and take care of yourself and your team!

    Lesson 5 – Adapt to changing conditions and new information

    You might think that bridgebuilding is all about upfront design. Traditional waterfall projects. However, while the Brooklyn Bridge started out with a series of extremely detailed schematics, the engineers CONSTANTLY adjusted their plan based on the latest information. When the team started digging the New York side of the bridge base, they had no idea how deep they’d have to go. That answer would impact a cascading series of dependencies that had to be adjusted on the fly. The engineers didn’t believe they could factor everything in up front, and instead, stayed closely in tune to the construction process so that they could continually adjust.

    Software engineering is the same. There’s a reason why many developers detest waterfall project delivery! Agile isn’t perfect, but at least it’s realistic. Teams have to deliver in small batches and learn along the way. It’s remarkably difficult to design something upfront and expect that NOTHING will change during the subsequent construction.

    Lesson 6 – It’s critical to do testing along the way

    In reading this book, I was struck by how much math was involved in building a bridge. The engineers constantly calculated every dimension—water pressure, wire strength, tension, and much more—and then re-calculated once pieces went into place. They did rigorous testing of the wire provided by suppliers to make sure that their assumptions were correct.

    Software teams are no different. Whether or not you think test-driven development works, I doubt anyone doubts the value of rigorous (automated) testing. That’s one reason I think continuous integration is awesome: test constantly and don’t assume that these pieces will magically fit together perfectly at some future date.

    Lesson 7 – Build for unexpected use cases

    Roebling didn’t take any chances. He wanted to build a bridge that would last for hundreds of years, and therefore made sure that his bridge was much stronger than it had to be. At nearly every stage, he added cushion to account for the unexpected. When building the caisson that protected the workers as they dug the bridge foundation, Roebling designed it to withstand a remarkable amount of pressure. Same goes for the wire that holds the bridge up. He built it to be 5-10x stronger than necessary. That’s one reason that the introduction of the automobile didn’t require any changes to the bridge. In fact, there were NO major changes needed for the Brooklyn Bridge for fifty years. That’s impressive.

    With microservices, we see this principle apply more and more. We don’t exactly know how everything will get used, and tight coupling gets us in trouble. While we need to avoid over-engineering in an attempt to future-proof our services, it is important to recognize that your software will likely be used in ways you didn’t anticipate.

    Lesson 8 – Don’t settle for the cheapest material and contractors

    “The lowest bidder.” Those are three scary words when you actually care about quality. With the Brooklyn Bridge, the board of directors went against Roebling’s strong advice and chose a wire manufacturer that was the lowest bidder, but led by a suspect individual. This manufacturer ended up committing fraud by exchanging accepted wire for rejected wire because they couldn’t manufacture enough quality material.

    When building software that matters, you better use tech that works, regardless of price. Now, with the prevalence of excellent open source software, it’s not always the software cost itself that come into play. But, who builds your software, and who supports it, matters a ton and shouldn’t go to whoever does it the cheapest. Smart companies invest in their people and splurge when necessary to get software they can trust.

    Lesson 9 – Invest in your foundation

    When building a bridge, the base matters. During the age when Roebling was learning about and building bridges, there were many bridge that collapsed due to poor design. That’s kinda terrifying. Roebling was laser-focused on building a strong foundation for his bridge, and as mentioned above, built his towers to an unheard-of strength.

    The foundation of your software is going to directly decide how successful you are. What is it running on? A homegrown hodge-podge of tech that you’re scared to reboot? A ten year old operating system that’s no longer supported? Stop that. Sure, I think Pivotal Cloud Foundry is just about the best foundation you can have, but I don’t care what you choose. Your software foundation should be rock-solid, reliable, and a little boring.

    Lesson 10 – Accept that politics are necessary

    As you can imagine, embarking on one of the most expensive infrastructure projects in the history of the world required some strange bedfellows. In the case of the Brooklyn Bridge, it meant getting the support of the shady Boss Tweed. Likewise, Roebling and team had to constantly answer to a host of politicians who used the bridge as part of the political platforms.

    Software projects aren’t immune from politics. New projects may disrupt the status quo and make enemies within impacted organizations. Unexpected costs could require broad support from financial stakeholders. I’ve learned the hard way that you need a wide set of high-ranking supporters to have your back when projects or products hit a wall. Don’t take an “us-against-the-world” approach if you want to win.

    Lesson 11 – Be transparent on progress, but not TOO transparent

    Given the costs of the bridge, it’s easy to see why there was a lot of oversight and scrutiny. The engineers were constantly paraded in front of the board of directors to answer questions and share their progress. In some cases, they kept certain internal engineering debates private because they didn’t want non-technical stakeholders freaking out. It was important to openly share major issues, but airing ALL of the challenges would have led to clueless politicians blowing minor issues out of proportion.

    This is the same case when building software. I’m sure we’ve all had to roll-up our progress in a series of status reports to the various stakeholders. And even within our software teams, we’ve shared our progress at a morning standup. It’s super important to be honest in these settings. But, there are also issues that are best resolved within the team and not carelessly shared with those that cannot understand the implications. It’s a fine line, but one that good teams know how to straddle.

    Lesson 12 – Celebrate success!

    When the bridge was finally done, there was a massive party. The President of the United States, along with a whole host of luminaries, led a parade across the Brooklyn Bridge and partied for hours afterwards. The engineers were celebrated, and those that had poured years of their life into this project felt a profound sense of pride.

    Software teams have to do this as well. With our modern continuous delivery mindset, there aren’t as many major release milestones to rally around. However, it’d be a mistake to stop the tradition of pausing to reflect on progress, celebrate the accomplishment, and recognize those that worked hard.

     

  • Trying out the “standard” and “enterprise” templates in Azure Logic Apps

    Is the Microsoft integration team “back”? It might be premature to say that Microsoft has finally figured out its app integration story, but the signs are very positive. There’s been a fresh influx of talent like Jon Fancey, Tord Glad Nordahl, and Jim Harrer, some welcome forethought into the overall Microsoft integration story, better community engagement, and a noticeable uptick in the amount of software released by these teams.

    One area that’s been getting tons of focus in Azure Logic Apps. Logic Apps are a potential successor to classic on-premises application integration tools, but with a cloud-first bent. Users can visually model flows made up of built-in, or custom, activities. The initial integrations supported by Logic Apps were focused on cloud endpoints, but with the recent beta release of the Enterprise Integration Pack, Microsoft is making its move to more traditional use cases. I haven’t messed around with Logic Apps for a few months, and lots of things have changed, so I tested out both the standard and enterprise templates.

    One nice thing about things like Logic Apps is that anyone can get started with just a browser. If you’re building a standard workflow (read: doesn’t require extra services or the “enterprise integration” bits), then you don’t have to install a single thing. To start with, I went the Azure Portal (the new one, not the classic one), and created a new “Logic App.”

    2016-09-09-logic02

    I was then presented with a choice for how to populate the app itself. There’s the default “blank” template, or, I can start off with a few pre-canned options. Some of these are a bit contrived (“save my tweets to a SharePoint list” makes me sad), but they give you a good idea of what’s possible with the many built-in connectors.

    2016-09-09-logic01

    I chose the HTTP Request-Response template since my goal was to build a simple synchronous web service. The portal showed me what this template does, and dropped me into the design canvas with the HTTP Request and HTTP Response activities in place.

    2016-09-09-logic03

    I have a birthday coming and am feeling old, so I decided to build a simple service that would tell me if I was old or not. In order to easily use the fields of an inbound JSON message, I had to define a simple JSON schema inside the HTTP Request shape. This schema defines a string for the “name” and an integer for the “age.”

    2016-09-09-logic04

    Before sending a response, I want to actually do something! So, I added an if-then condition to the canvas. There are other conditionals available, such as for-each and do-until. I put this if-then shape in between the Request and Response elements, and was able to choose the “age” value for my conditional check.

    2016-09-09-logic06

    Here, I checked to see if “age” is greater than 40. Notice that I also had access to the “name” field, as well as the whole request body or HTTP headers. Next, I wanted to send a different HTTP response for over-40, and under-40. The brand new “compose” activity is the answer. With this, I could create a new message to send back in the HTTP response.

    2016-09-09-logic07

    I simply typed a new JSON message into the Compose activity, using the variable for the “name”, and adding some text to categorize the requestor’s age.

    2016-09-09-logic08

    I then did the same thing for the “no” path of the if-then and had a complete flow!

    2016.09.09.logic09.png

    Quick and easy! The topmost HTTP Receive activity has the URL for this particular Logic App, and since I didn’t apply any security policies, it was super simple to invoke. From within my favorite API testing tool, Postman, I submitted a JSON message to the endpoint. Sure enough, I got back a response that corresponded to the provided age.

    2016-09-09-logic10

    Great. But what about doing all the Enterprisey stuff? I built another new Logic App, and this time, wanted to send a comma separated payload to an HTTP endpoint and get back XML. There’s a Logic Apps template for that and when I selected it, I was told I needed an “integration account.”

    2016-09-09-logic11

    So I got out of Logic Apps, and went off to create an Integration Account in the Portal. Integration Accounts are a preview service from Microsoft. These accounts hold all the integration artifacts used in enterprise integration scenarios: schemas, maps, certificates, partners, and trading agreements.

    2016-09-09-logic12

    How do I get these artifacts, you ask? This is where client-side development comes in. I downloaded the Enterprise Integration Tools–which is really just Visual Studio extensions that give you the BizTalk schema editor and mapper–and fired up Visual Studio. This adds an “integration” project type to Visual Studio, and also let me add XML schemas, flat file schemas, and maps to a project.

    2016-09-09-logic13

    I then set out to build some enterprise-class schemas defining a “person” (one flat file schema, one XML schema) and a map converting one format to another. I built the flat file schema using a sample comma-separated file and the provided Flat File Wizard. Hello, my old friend.

    2016-09-09-logic17

    The map is super simple. It just concatenates the inbound fields into a single outbound field in the XML schema. Note that the destination field has a “max occurs” of “*” to make sure that it adds one “name” element for each set of source elements. And yes, the mapper includes the Functoids for basic calculations, logical conditions, and string manipulation.

    2016-09-09-logic14

    The Azure Integration Account doesn’t take in DLLs, so I loaded in the raw XSD and map files. Note that you need to build the project to get the XSLT version of the map. The Azure portal doesn’t take the raw .btm map.

    2016-09-09-logic15

    Back in my Logic App, I found the Properties page for the app and made sure to set the “integration account” property so that it saw my schemas and maps.

    2016-09-09-logic16

    I then went back and spun up the VETER Logic Apps template. Because there seemed to be a lot of places where things could go wrong, I removed all the other shapes from the design canvas and just started with the flat file decoding. Let’s get that working first! Since I associated my “Integration Account” with this Logic App, it was easy to select my schema from the drop-down list. With that, I tested.

    2016-09-09-logic19

    Shoot. The first call failed. Fortunately, Logic Apps comes with a pretty sweet dashboard and tracing interface. I noticed that the flat file decoding failed, and it looked like it got angry with my schema defining a carriage-return-plus-line-feed delimiter for records, when all I sent it was a line feed (via my API testing tool). So, I went back to my schema, changed the record delimiter, updated my schema (and map) in the Integration Account, and tested again.

    2016-09-09-logic20

    Success! Notice that it turned my input flat file into an XML representation.

    Feeling irrationally confident, I went to the Logic Apps design surface, clicked the “templates” button at the top and re-selected the VETER template to get all the activities back that I needed. However, I forgot that the “mapping” activity requires that I have an Azure Functions container set up. Apparently the maps are executed inside Microsoft’s serverless framework, Azure Functions. Microsoft’s docs are pretty cryptic about what to do here, but if you follow the links in this KB (“create container”, “add function”), you get the default mapper template as an Azure Function.

    2016-09-09-logic21

    Ok, now I was set. My final Logic App configuration looked like this.

    2016-09-09-logic23

    The app takes in a flat file, validates the flat file using the flat file (really, XML) schema, uses a built-in check to see that it’s a decoded flat file, executes my map within an Azure Function, and finally returns the result back. I then called the Logic App from Postman.

    2016-09-09-logic24

    BAM! It worked. That’s … awesome. While some of you may have fainted in horror at the idea of using flat files and XML in a shiny new Logic App, this does show that Microsoft is trying to cater to some of the existing constraints of their customers.

    Overall, I thought the Logic Apps experience was pretty darn good. The tooling has a few rough edges, but was fairly intuitive. The biggest gap is the documentation and number of public samples, but that’s to be expected with such new technology. I’d definitely recommend giving the Enterprise Integration Pack a try and see what sort of unholy flows you can come up with!

  • Enterprises fighting back, Spring Boot is the best, and other SpringOne Platform takeaways

    Last week I was in Las Vegas for SpringOne Platform. This conference had one of the greatest session lists I’ve ever seen, and brought together nearly 2,000 people interested in microservices, Java Spring, DevOps, agile, Cloud Foundry, and cloud-native development. With sponsors like Google, Microsoft, HortonWorks, Accenture, and AWS, and over 400 different companies represented by attendees, the conference had a unique blend of characters. I spent some time reflecting on the content and vibe of SpringOne Platform, and noticed that I kept coming back to the following themes.

    #1 – Enterprises are fighting back.

    Finally! Large, established companies are tired of operating slow-moving, decrepit I.T. departments where nothing interesting happens. At SpringOne Platform, I saw company after company talking about how they are creating change, and then showing the results. Watch this insightful keynote from Citi where they outline pain points, and how they’ve changed their team structure, culture, and technology:

    You don’t have to work at Uber, Etsy, Netflix or AWS to work on cutting-edge technology. Enterprises have woken up to the fact that outsourcing their strategic technology skills was a dumb decision. What are they doing to recover?

    1. Newfound focus on hiring and expanding technology talent. In just about every enterprise-led session I attended, the presentation closed with a “we’re hiring!” notice. Netflix has been ending their blog posts with this call-to-action for YEARS. Enterprises are starting to sponsor conferences and go where developers hang out. Additionally, because you can’t just hire hundreds of devs that know cloud-native patterns, I’m seeing enterprises make a greater investment in their existing people. That’s one reason Pluralsight continues to explode in popularity as enterprises purchase subscriptions for all their tech teams.
    2. Upgrading and investing in technology. Give the devs what they want! Enterprises have started to realize that classic enterprise technology doesn’t attract talented people to work on it. Gartner predicts that by the year 2020, 75% of the apps supporting digital business will be built, not bought. That means that your dev teams need the tools and tech that let them crank out customer-centric, resilient apps. And they need support for using modern approaches to delivering software. If you invest in technology, you’ll attract the talent to work with it.

     

    #2 – Spring Boot is the best application bootstrapping experience, period.

    For 17+ years I’ve either coded in .NET or Node.js (with a little experimentation in Go, Ruby, and Java). After joining Pivotal, I decided that I should learn Spring, since that’s our jam.

    I’ve never seen anything better than Spring Boot for getting developers rolling. Instead of spending hours (days?) setting up boilerplate code, and finding the right mix of dependencies for your project, Spring Boot takes care of all that. Give me 4 minutes, and I can build and deploy a git-backed Configuration Server. In a few moments I can flip on OAuth2 security or distributed tracing. And this isn’t hello-world quality stuff; this is the productization of Netflix OSS and other battle tested technology that you can use with simple code annotations. That’s amazing, and you can use the Spring Initializer to get started today.

    2016.08.10.s1p01

    Smart companies realize that devs shouldn’t be building infrastructure, app scaffolding or wrangling dependencies; they should be creating user experiences and business logic. Whereas Node.js has a billion packages and I spend plenty of time selecting ones that don’t have Guy Fieri images embedded, Spring Boot gives devs a curated, integrated set of packages. And it’s saving companies like Comcast, millions of dollars.

    Presenter after presenter at SpringOne Platform were able to quickly demonstrate complex distributed systems concepts by using Spring Boot apps. Java innovation happens in Spring.

    #3 A wave of realism has swept over the industry.

    I’m probably being optimistic, but it seems like some of the hype is settling down, and we’re actually getting to work on transformation. The SpringOne Platform talks (both in sessions, and hallway/lunch conversations) weren’t about visions of the future, but actual in-progress efforts. Transformation is hard and there aren’t shortcuts. Simply containerizing won’t make a difference, for example.

    Talk after talk, conducted by analysts or customers, highlighted the value of assessing your existing app portfolio, and identifying where refactoring or replatforming can add value. Just lifting and shifting to a container orchestration platform doesn’t actually improve things. At best, you’ve optimized the infrastructure, while ignoring the real challenge: improving the delivery pipeline. Same goes for configuration management, and other technologies that don’t establish meaningful change. It takes a mix of cultural overhaul, management buy-in, and yes, technology. I didn’t see anyone at the conference promising silver bullets. But at the same time, there were some concrete next steps for teams looking for accelerate their efforts.

    #4 The cloud wars have officially moved above IaaS.

    IaaS is definitely not a commodity (although pricing has stabilized), but you’re seeing the major three clouds working hard to own the services layer above the raw infrastructure. Gartner’s just-released IaaS Magic Quadrant shows clear leadership by AWS, Microsoft, and Google, and not accidentally, all three sponsored SpringOne Platform. Google brought over 20 people to the conference, and still couldn’t handle the swarms of people at their booth trying out Spring Boot! An integrated platform on top of leading clouds gives the best of all worlds.

    Great infrastructure matters, but native services in the cloud are becoming the key differentiator for one over another. Want services to bridge on-premises and cloud apps? Azure is a strong choice. Need high performing data storage services? AWS is fantastic. Looking at next generation machine learning and data processing? Google is bleeding edge. At SpringOne Platform, I heard established companies—including Home Depot, the GAP, Merrill Corp—explain why the loved Pivotal Cloud Foundry, especially when it integrated with native services in their cloud of choice. The power of platforms, baby.

    #5 Data microservices is the next frontier.

    I love, love that we’re talking about the role of data in a microservices world. It’s one thing to design and deliver stateless web apps, and scale the heck out of them. We’ve got lots of patterns for that. But what about the data? Are there ways to deploy and manage data platforms with extreme automation? How about scaling real-time and batch data processing? There were tons of sessions about data at SpringOne Platform, and Pivotal’s Data team wrote up some awesome summaries throughout the week:

    It’s almost always about data, and I think it’s great that we had PACKED sessions full of people working through these emerging ideas.

    #6 Pivotal is making a difference.

    I’m very proud of what our customers are doing with the help of Pivotal people and technologies. While we tried to make sure we didn’t beat people over the head with “Pivotal is GREAT” stuff, it became clear that the “Pivotal Way” is working and transforming the how the largest companies in the world build software.

    The Gap talked about going from weeks to deploy code changes, to mere minutes. That has a material impact on how they interact with their customers. And for many, this isn’t about net new applications. Almost everyone who presented talked about how to approach existing investments and find new value. It’s fun to be on this journey to simplify the future.

    Want to help make a difference at Pivotal and drive the future of software? We’re always hiring.

  • Who is really supposed to use the (multi)cloud GUI?

    How do YOU prefer to interact with infrastructure clouds? A growing number of people seem to prefer APIs, SDKs, and CLIs over any graphical UI. It’s easy to understand why: few GUIs offer the ability to create the repeatable, automated processes needed to use compute at scale. I just wrote up an InfoQ story about a big update to the AWS EC2 Run Command feature—spoiler: you can now execute commands against servers located ANYWHERE—and it got me thinking about how we interact with resources. In this post, I’ll try and figure out who cares about GUIs, and, show off an example of the EC2 Run Command in action.

    If you’re still stuck dealing with servers and haven’t yet upgraded to an IaaS-agnostic cloud-native platform, then you’re looking for ways to create a consistent experience. Surveys keep showing that teams are flocking to GUI-light, automation-centric software for configuration management (e.g. Chef, Ansible), resource provisioning (e.g. Terraform, AWS CloudFormation, Azure Resource Manager), and software deployment. As companies do “hybrid computing” and mix and match servers from different providers, they really need to figure out a way to establish some consistent practices for building and managing  many servers. Is the answer to use the cloud provider’s native GUI or a GUI-centric “multi-cloud manager” tool? I don’t think so.

    Multi-cloud vendors are trying to put a useful layer of abstraction on top of non-commodity IaaS, but you end up with what AWS CEO Andy Jassy calls the “lowest common denominator.” Multi-cloud vendors struggle to keep up with the blistering release pace of public cloud vendors they support, and often neutralize the value of a given cloud by trying to create a common experience. No, the answer seems to be to use these GUIs for simple scenarios only, and rely primarily on APIs and automation that you can control.

    But SOMEONE is using these (multi)cloud GUIs! They must offer some value. So who is the real audience for the cloud provider portals, or multi-cloud products now offered by Cisco (Cliqr), IBM (Gravitant), and CenturyLink (ElasticBox)?

    • Business users. One clear area of value in cloud GUIs is for managers who want to dip in and see what’s been deployed, and finance personnel who are doing cost modeling and billing. The native portals offered by cloud providers are getting better at this, but it’s also been an area where multi-cloud brokers have invested heavily. I don’t want to ask the dev manager to write an app that pulls the AWS billing history. That seems … abusive. Use the GUI.
    • Infrequent tech users with simple tasks. Look, I only log into the AWS portal every month or so. It wouldn’t make a ton of sense for me to build out a whole provisioning and management pipeline to build a server every so often. Even dropping down to the CLI isn’t more productive in those cases (for me). Other people at your company may be frequent, power users and it makes sense for them to automate the heck out of their cloud. In my case, the GUI is (mostly) fine. Many of the cloud provider portals reflect this reality. Look at the Azure Portal. It is geared towards executing individual actions with a lot of visual flair. It is not a productivity interface, or something supportive of bulk activities. Same with most multi-cloud tools I’ve seen. Go build a server, perform an action or two. In those cases, rock on. Use the GUI.
    • Companies with only a few slow-changing servers. If you have 10-50 servers in the cloud, and you don’t turn them over very often, then it can make sense to use the native cloud GUI for a majority of your management. A multi-cloud broker would be overkill. Don’t prematurely optimize.

    I think AWS nailed its target use case with EC2 Run Command. When it first launched in October of 2015, it was for AWS Windows servers. Amazon now supports Windows and Linux, and servers inside or outside of AWS data centers. Run ad-hoc PowerShell or Linux scripts, install software, update the OS, you name it. Kick it off with the AWS Console, API, SDK, CLI or via PowerShell extensions. And because it’s agent based and pull-driven, AWS doesn’t have to know a thing about the cloud the server is hosted in. It’s a straightforward, configurable, automation-centric, and free way to do basic cross-cloud management.

    How’s it work? First, I created an EC2 “activation” which is used to generate a code to register the “managed instances.” When creating it, I also set up a security role in Identity and Access Management (IAM) which allows me to assign rights to people to issue commands.

    2016.07.12.ec203

    Out of the activation, I received a code and ID that’s used to register a new server. With the activation in place, I built a pair of Windows servers in Microsoft Azure and CenturyLink Cloud. I logged into each server, and installed the AWS Tools for Windows PowerShell. Then, I pasted a simple series of commands into the Windows PowerShell for AWS window:

    $dir = $env:TEMP + "\ssm"
    
    New-Item -ItemType directory -Path $dir
    
    cd $dir
    
    (New-Object System.Net.WebClient).DownloadFile("https://amazon-ssm-us-east-1.s3.amazonaws.com/latest/windows_amd64/AmazonSSMAgentSetup.exe", $dir + "\AmazonSSMAgentSetup.exe")
    
    Start-Process .\AmazonSSMAgentSetup.exe -ArgumentList @("/q", "/log", "install.log", "CODE=<my code>", "ID=<my id>", "REGION=us-east-1") -Wait
    
    Get-Content ($env:ProgramData + "\Amazon\SSM\InstanceData\registration")
    
    Get-Service -Name "AmazonSSMAgent"
    

    The commands simply download the agent software, installs it as a Windows Service, and registers the box with AWS. Immediately after installing the agent on servers in other clouds, I saw them listed in the Amazon Console. Sweet.

    2016.07.12.ec205

    Now the fun stuff. I can execute commands from existing Run Command documents (e.g. “install missing Windows updates”), run ad-hoc commands, find public documents written by others, or create my own documents.

    For instance, I could do a silly-simple “ipconfig” ad-hoc request against my two servers …

    2016.07.12.ec207

    … and I almost immediately received the resulting output. If I expected a ton of output from the command, I could log it all to S3 object storage.

    2016.07.12.ec208

    As I pick documents to execute, the parameters change. In this case, choosing the “install application” document means that I provide a binary source and some parameters:

    2016.07.12.ec209

    I’ve shown off the UI here (ironically, I guess), but the real value is that I could easily create documents or execute commands from the AWS CLI or something like the Node SDK. What a great way to do hybrid, ad-hoc management! It’s not a complete solution and doesn’t replace config management or multi-cloud provisioning tools, but it’s a pretty handy way to manage a fleet of distributed servers.

    There’s definitely a place for GUIs when working with infrastructure clouds, but they really aren’t meant for power users. If you’re forcing your day-to-day operations/service team to work through a GUI-centric tool, you’re telling them that you don’t value their time. Rather, make sure that any vendor-provided software your operations team gets their hands on has an API. If not, don’t use it.

    What do you think? Other scenarios with using the GUI makes the most sense?